Waste intelligence for commercial buildings
Every kilogram, accounted for.
Wastify AI is the UK’s first end-to-end waste intelligence platform. Every disposal is weighed at source, photographed, attributed to the tenant and priced to the penny. If an auditor, a tenant or a contractor questions a number, the evidence is one click away.
Gold winner 2026
Green Innovation
Commonwealth Environment & CSR Awards, alongside Siemens and Lloyd’s
Finalist 2026
Digital Transformation
European Cleaning & Hygiene Awards
- Verified at source
- EWC-mapped
- Audit ready
- Live in 7 days
of waste weighed at disposal
every kilogram verified on our scales, with photo evidence
- 928,000+
- Verified weighings
- 1,900+ tonnes
- CO2e avoided
- 18,200+
- Trees saved
- 380+
- Companies
each one photographed
from documented stream ratios
paper and cardboard equivalents
reporting waste data through the platform
as of 16 September 2026 at 19:18:26 BST
The portal
What a well-run building looks like.
Building overview
One Harbourgate
All streams · this period
6,240kg
851 weighings · every one photographed
73.4%
vs 71.5% previous period · verified at source
- Recycled58.6%
- Recovered24.2%
- Anaerobic digestion17.2%
84.2/100
Weighted across recycling, contamination and coverage
Waste generated by stream
All 29 streamsCompany waste consumption
Largest contributor
Bellhaven Coffee
24.9%
- 124.9%76.8%
Bellhaven CoffeeF&B
1,554.4 kg
- 218.1%81.4%
Marrow & Sage KitchenF&B
1,129.6 kg
- 311.2%74.5%
Northshore MediaOffice
699.0 kg
- 48.7%62.9%
Fenwick LegalOffice
543.1 kg
- 56.1%70.3%
Atlas FacilitiesCommunal
380.6 kg
Requires attention
1 watch · 2 clearContamination 6.2%, well below the 20% threshold
Down 2.1% on last period · no alerts fired
Marrow & Sage Kitchen passed its 80% recycling goal
Goal achieved two months ahead of target
Cardboard volumes up 6% this period
Seasonal deliveries · an extra collection is scheduled
You already know this
Everyone in the building has a number. Nobody has a record.
- The contractor weighs nothing, and the invoice arrives anyway, priced on their own estimates. There is no data to dispute a line of it.
- Tenants who never recycle pay the same service charge as tenants who do. Nobody can prove otherwise, so nobody argues.
- The recycling rate in the ESG report is a guess. If GRESB or an assurance provider asks how it was produced, the answer is a contractor summary.
- Contamination is discovered when a load is rejected. By then it is a cost, a missed target, and nobody knows which floor it came from.
Their invoice today
- Volume assumed from bin counts.
- Weights estimated by the collector.
- Data owned by the company being paid.
- No way to dispute a single line.
With Contractor Mode
- Every bin weighed before it leaves the building.
- Timestamped against building and stream.
- Data owned by the building.
- Invoice checked line by line against verified weights.
Ungoverned waste data is not an operations problem. It is money leaking, targets missed silently, and ESG claims you cannot defend.
Where does your building sit?
Three levels of waste management.
Most commercial buildings are still at level zero. Wastify AI is the entry into smart waste tracking, and it makes the entry as frictionless as the industry allows.
- 01
No tracking.
Paper, guesses and supplier averages. Nothing is logged. This is the industry norm right now.
- 02
Wastify Standard.
A smart kiosk in the waste room: PIN, tenant, weigh, confirm. Four steps per stream, and the building has verified data for the first time.
Level 0 · today
No tracking
Paper, guesses, supplier averages. This is most commercial buildings right now.
nothing logged
Level 1 · Wastify Standard
Verified data, for the first time
Every disposal weighed, attributed and photographed at the kiosk.
4 steps per stream
The platform
Three things, done properly.
Verified capture.
A smart scale, a camera and a PIN in the waste room. Every disposal carries tenant, stream, net weight, photo and timestamp. 29 waste streams, every one mapped to an EWC code with a documented disposal outcome.
Fair recharging.
Collection, sack, rental and management costs split by verified weight, not floor area. A league table per building, every line traceable to weighed, photographed records. Dispute-proof because it is evidence, not apportionment.
Intelligence that answers back.
Contamination tracked to the floor and alerted at your thresholds. Goals with KPIs against live data. Ask the Living AI in plain English and get an answer grounded in the records, with the sources attached.
portal · waste records
Waste records
One Harbourgate · live feed
| ID | Company | Stream | Net weight | Type | Logged | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 908417 | Bellhaven Coffee | Coffee Grounds | 8.25 kg | Scales | 16 Aug, 17:00 | |
| 908416 | Marrow & Sage Kitchen | Food Waste | 10.15 kg | Scales | 16 Aug, 16:54 | |
| 908415 | Fenwick Legal | Confidential Paper | 2.85 kg | Scales | 16 Aug, 16:41 | |
| 908414 | Northshore Media | Mixed Recycling | 1.20 kg | Scales | 16 Aug, 16:22 | |
| 908413 | Atlas Facilities | General Waste | 12.30 kg | Scales | 16 Aug, 16:09 | |
| 908412 | Tamarind House | Glass | 0.35 kg | Scales | 16 Aug, 16:02 | |
| 908411 | Osier & Co | Cardboard | 3.15 kg | Scales | 16 Aug, 15:47 | |
| 908410 | Bellhaven Coffee | Coffee Cups | 1.45 kg | Scales | 16 Aug, 15:31 | |
Rows 1–8 of | ||||||
Dispute-proof, demonstrated
A tenant disputes the charge. Walk it down.
A service charge line is only as strong as what sits underneath it. Under an area-based apportionment there is nothing underneath it, which is why the dispute goes nowhere slowly and sours the relationship on the way.
Here, the line opens. The charge descends to the allocation run, the allocation to the stream totals, the totals to individual weighings, and the weighing to a photograph of the bags on the scale at the moment they were weighed. The conversation ends at the photograph.
Five steps down, and the last one is a photograph.
INVOICE / LINE 7
The service charge line the tenant disputes
£3,221.42 waste recharge, one month
RECHARGE RUN
The allocation behind it
22.4% of building waste by verified weight, five cost components
STREAM TOTALS
The weights behind the share
1,554.4 kg across 6 streams, net of bin tare weights
RECORD 908417
One weighing among them
8.25 kg Coffee Grounds · 16 Aug, 17:00 · EWC 20 01 08
EVIDENCE
The photograph
the bags on the scale, the moment they were weighed
Five steps down, and the last one is a photograph. That is what dispute-proof means.
The fairness principle
Recycle more, pay less. Verified.
Weight-based recharging is the first allocation model tenants accept as fair, because every charge is backed by a weighed, photographed record they can inspect. The incentive follows the evidence: the diligent recycler stops subsidising the contaminator.
- 01
Fair billing from day one
- 02
Recycling recognised, contamination priced
- 03
Every charge inspectable
Split by floor area
- Diligent recycler, 400 m²£1,610
- Heavy contaminator, 400 m²£1,610
Same bill. The recycler subsidises the contaminator, and neither can prove it.
Split by verified weight
- Diligent recycler£1,035
- Heavy contaminator£2,185
Recycle more, pay less. Every charge backed by a record.
Behaviour changes when the bill follows the behaviour. That is what moved one estate from 39% to 68% recycling in six months.
Two minutes
Would your waste data survive a dispute, an audit, or an inspection?
Six questions. An honest score, and a list of exactly what would fail.
Built for the regulations your buildings already answer to.
- Simpler Recycling 2025
- Digital Waste Tracking
- EPA Duty of Care
- EWC Coding
- CSRD
- ESRS E5
- GRESB
- BREEAM
- SECR
- ISO 14001
Live now, across Central London’s commercial estates.
- Weighed at source
- 5,022,000+ kg
- Verified weighings
- 928,000+
- Reports generated
- 14,000+
- Recharged on verified data
- £590k+
Weighed at source
rounded down, never up
Verified weighings
each with photo evidence
Reports generated
Recharged on verified data
A multi-tenant Central London estate
From 39% to 68% recycling in six months.
Recycling was reported from contractor summaries, contamination was discovered at rejection, and tenants were billed by floor area.
Wastify Touch in the waste rooms, weight-based recharging, and contamination alerts at the building’s own thresholds.
Verified recycling rose from 39% to 68%, and the recharge stopped being disputed because every line opened to a record.
Client identifiers anonymised. Structure unmodified.
Insights
What we are reading and writing.
Regulation, recharging and what verified data actually changes in a building. Written for property teams, not for search engines.
Your waste data should belong to you.
Not to the contractor being paid to collect it. A one-hour session, tailored to your buildings, tenants and compliance requirements.